Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] DT: bindings: Powerzone new bindings | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:28:46 +0100 |
| |
Hi Arnd,
thanks you for your feedbacks.
I'll wait for feedbacks from Rob and propose a version with implementation.
On 18/11/2021 14:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> The proposed bindings are describing a powerzone, a power capping >> capable place to act on and where we can read the power >> consumption. The powerzone semantic is also found on the Intel >> platform with the RAPL register. >> >> The powerzone can also represent a group of children powerzones, hence >> the description can result on a hierarchy. >> >> The description gives the power constraint dependencies to apply on a >> specific group of logically or physically aggregated devices. They do >> not represent the physical location or the power domains of the SoC >> even if the description could be similar. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > Hi Daniel, > > This looks reasonable to me, based on what I remember from previous > discussions, but it would be good if you could summarize the points that > have already been discussed in the past, e.g. which approaches you have > tried out before and how you ended up here, including links to mailing > list archives. > > I know you've been at this for quite some time now, but I can never > remember the bits that we discussed in the past myself. > > Arnd >
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |