lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/6] MIPS: Octeon: qspinlock: Exclude mmiowb()
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:36:25PM +0100, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
>
> On Octeon mmiowb() is SYNCW, which is already contained in
> smp_store_release(). Removing superfluous barrier brings around 10%
> performance on uncontended tight spinlock loops.

It is only implied when CONFIG_SMP, does OCTEON mandate CONFIG_SMP ?

The code could use a comment to explain this for the next poor sod
trying to understand it.

> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 0a707f3..fbe97b4 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
> */
> static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
> /* This could be optimised with ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB */
> mmiowb();
> +#endif
> smp_store_release(&lock->locked, 0);
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
> nudge_writes();
> --
> 2.10.2
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-28 00:27    [W:1.576 / U:0.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site