lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()
Date
From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>

This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.

Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
insn->dst_reg,
insn->off, insn->src_reg);
else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
- (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
+ (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
insn->code,
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-27 05:07    [W:1.597 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site