Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:38:26 +0000 | From | Jonathan Cameron <> | Subject | Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres |
| |
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:09:56 +0100 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:15:15 +0000 > > Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> > > > > Sent: Monday 30 November 2020 8:21 PM > > > > To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> > > > > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler > > > > <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>; Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; linux- > > > > iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>; Anand Ashok Dumbre > > > > <ANANDASH@xilinx.com> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:27:56 +0100 > > > > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > > > > > > > > > This is a follow-up to commit 750628c79bb1 ("iio: adc: xilinx-xadc: > > > > > use devm_krealloc()"). I noticed we can use even more devres helpers > > > > > and entirely drop the remove() callback. > > > > > > > > > > v1 -> v2: > > > > > - squash three patches adding more devres calls into one for easier > > > > > review > > > > > - don't insist on the 80 characters limit > > > > > - add a new helper: devm_krealloc_array() and use it > > > > > > > > > > v2 -> v3: > > > > > - drop the devm_krealloc_array() helper > > > > > > > > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (3): > > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use helper variable for &pdev->dev > > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use devm_krealloc() instead of kfree() + kcalloc() > > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use more devres helpers and remove remove() > > > > > > > > > > drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 157 > > > > > ++++++++++++++--------------- > > > > > 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Series looks good to me but would like to leave it a little longer to let others > > > > take a look at it. That will probably mean it falls into next cycle now. > > > > > > > > +CC Anand who is looking at another series touching this driver and > > > > +might > > > > give this one a spin as well. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, Bartosz, > > > > > > I have tested and reviewed the patch and everything looks good. > > > I have another patch series on the same files that might cause conflicts. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com> > > > Tested-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com> > > Thanks, > > > > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for > > the autobuilders to play with it. > > > > There was a small amount of fuzz. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jonathan > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > I still don't see these patches in next - is any action required of me > to get this in for the next release?
Nope. I still haven't gotten round to asking for the iio tree itself to be pulled into next, and I've been a bit busy so haven't yet sent a pull request to Greg KH this cycle.
I'll get the second sorted, probably later this week.
J
> > Bartosz > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
| |