Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartosz Golaszewski <> | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:09:56 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres |
| |
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:15:15 +0000 > Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> > > > Sent: Monday 30 November 2020 8:21 PM > > > To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> > > > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler > > > <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>; Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; linux- > > > iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Bartosz Golaszewski > > > <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>; Anand Ashok Dumbre > > > <ANANDASH@xilinx.com> > > > Subject: Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:27:56 +0100 > > > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > > > > > > > This is a follow-up to commit 750628c79bb1 ("iio: adc: xilinx-xadc: > > > > use devm_krealloc()"). I noticed we can use even more devres helpers > > > > and entirely drop the remove() callback. > > > > > > > > v1 -> v2: > > > > - squash three patches adding more devres calls into one for easier > > > > review > > > > - don't insist on the 80 characters limit > > > > - add a new helper: devm_krealloc_array() and use it > > > > > > > > v2 -> v3: > > > > - drop the devm_krealloc_array() helper > > > > > > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (3): > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use helper variable for &pdev->dev > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use devm_krealloc() instead of kfree() + kcalloc() > > > > iio: adc: xilinx: use more devres helpers and remove remove() > > > > > > > > drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 157 > > > > ++++++++++++++--------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Series looks good to me but would like to leave it a little longer to let others > > > take a look at it. That will probably mean it falls into next cycle now. > > > > > > +CC Anand who is looking at another series touching this driver and > > > +might > > > give this one a spin as well. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > Hi Jonathan, Bartosz, > > > > I have tested and reviewed the patch and everything looks good. > > I have another patch series on the same files that might cause conflicts. > > > > Reviewed-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com> > > Tested-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com> > Thanks, > > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for > the autobuilders to play with it. > > There was a small amount of fuzz. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan >
Hi Jonathan,
I still don't see these patches in next - is any action required of me to get this in for the next release?
Bartosz
| |