Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Alexandru Ardelean <> | Subject | [PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup() | Date | Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300 |
| |
The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID isn't recognized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> --- drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id) AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT; return 0; default: - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODEV; } } -- 2.17.1
| |