| Date | Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:11:23 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 47/76] x86/dumpstack/64: Add noinstr version of get_stack_info() |
| |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:54:42AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > index c49cf594714b..5a85730eb0ca 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct estack_pages estack_pages[CEA_ESTACK_PAGES] ____cacheline_aligned = { > EPAGERANGE(VC2), > }; > > -static bool in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info) > +static bool __always_inline in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
Yeah, checkpatch seems to complain correctly here:
ERROR: inline keyword should sit between storage class and type #88: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c:88: +static bool __always_inline in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
ERROR: inline keyword should sit between storage class and type #97: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c:129: +static bool __always_inline in_irq_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
> +int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task, > + struct stack_info *info, unsigned long *visit_mask) > +{ > + task = task ? : current; > + > + if (!stack) > + goto unknown; > + > + if (!get_stack_info_noinstr(stack, task, info)) > + goto unknown; > > -recursion_check: > /* > * Make sure we don't iterate through any given stack more than once. > * If it comes up a second time then there's something wrong going on: > @@ -196,4 +202,5 @@ int get_stack_info(unsigned long *stack, struct task_struct *task, > unknown: > info->type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN; > return -EINVAL; > + ^ Superfluous newline.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|