Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:17:34 +0800 | From | kernel test robot <> | Subject | [rcu:rcu/urgent 1/1] kernel/rcu/tree.c:253:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_atomic_add_return' |
| |
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent head: 239341154165cec3676955bab4cc1d61852257ed commit: 239341154165cec3676955bab4cc1d61852257ed [1/1] rcu: Fixup noinstr warnings config: s390-randconfig-r025-20200624 (attached as .config) compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8911a35180c6777188fefe0954a2451a2b91deaf) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-s390-linux-gnu git checkout 239341154165cec3676955bab4cc1d61852257ed # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:19:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32' (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x000000ffUL) << 24) | \ ^ In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:50: In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8: In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72: include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' ___constant_swab32(x) : \ ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:20:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32' (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x0000ff00UL) << 8) | \ ^ In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:50: In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8: In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72: include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' ___constant_swab32(x) : \ ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32' (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >> 8) | \ ^ In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:50: In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8: In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72: include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' ___constant_swab32(x) : \ ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32' (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24))) ^ In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:50: In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8: In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72: include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' __fswab32(x)) ^ In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:50: In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8: In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14: In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72: include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:511:46: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writew(cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:521:46: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] __raw_writel(cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:253:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_atomic_add_return' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c:253:8: note: did you mean 'atomic_add_return'? arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h:37:19: note: 'atomic_add_return' declared here static inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v) ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c:277:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_atomic_add_return' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); ^ >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:283:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_atomic_andnot' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] arch_atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c:283:3: note: did you mean 'atomic_andnot'? include/linux/atomic-fallback.h:652:1: note: 'atomic_andnot' declared here atomic_andnot(int i, atomic_t *v) ^ >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:316:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_atomic_read' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return !(arch_atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c:316:11: note: did you mean 'atomic_read'? arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h:20:19: note: 'atomic_read' declared here static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) ^ 20 warnings and 4 errors generated.
vim +/arch_atomic_add_return +253 kernel/rcu/tree.c
235 236 /* 237 * Record entry into an extended quiescent state. This is only to be 238 * called when not already in an extended quiescent state, that is, 239 * RCU is watching prior to the call to this function and is no longer 240 * watching upon return. 241 */ 242 static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter(void) 243 { 244 struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); 245 int seq; 246 247 /* 248 * CPUs seeing atomic_add_return() must see prior RCU read-side 249 * critical sections, and we also must force ordering with the 250 * next idle sojourn. 251 */ 252 rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! > 253 seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); 254 // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! 255 WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && 256 (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); 257 /* Better not have special action (TLB flush) pending! */ 258 WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && 259 (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK)); 260 } 261 262 /* 263 * Record exit from an extended quiescent state. This is only to be 264 * called from an extended quiescent state, that is, RCU is not watching 265 * prior to the call to this function and is watching upon return. 266 */ 267 static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit(void) 268 { 269 struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); 270 int seq; 271 272 /* 273 * CPUs seeing atomic_add_return() must see prior idle sojourns, 274 * and we also must force ordering with the next RCU read-side 275 * critical section. 276 */ 277 seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); 278 // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! 279 rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! 280 WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && 281 !(seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); 282 if (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK) { > 283 arch_atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); 284 smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* _exit after clearing mask. */ 285 } 286 } 287 288 /* 289 * Reset the current CPU's ->dynticks counter to indicate that the 290 * newly onlined CPU is no longer in an extended quiescent state. 291 * This will either leave the counter unchanged, or increment it 292 * to the next non-quiescent value. 293 * 294 * The non-atomic test/increment sequence works because the upper bits 295 * of the ->dynticks counter are manipulated only by the corresponding CPU, 296 * or when the corresponding CPU is offline. 297 */ 298 static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void) 299 { 300 struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); 301 302 if (atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR) 303 return; 304 atomic_add(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); 305 } 306 307 /* 308 * Is the current CPU in an extended quiescent state? 309 * 310 * No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information. 311 */ 312 static __always_inline bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void) 313 { 314 struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); 315 > 316 return !(arch_atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); 317 } 318
--- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org [unhandled content-type:application/gzip] | |