lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]
From
Date

On 24/06/2020 13:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
>>> # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
>>> # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
>>> # preparation in build-time C")).
>>> -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
>>> - -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
>>> +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
>>> + -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n \
>>> + $(btildflags-y) -T
>>>
>>> ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
>>> ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.
>
> Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.

Thanks, that will be great.

Jon

--
nvpublic

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-24 14:29    [W:0.466 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site