lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
> > # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
> > # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
> > # preparation in build-time C")).
> > -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
> > - -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
> > +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
> > + -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n \
> > + $(btildflags-y) -T
> >
> > ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
> > ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> >
>
>
> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.

Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-24 14:23    [W:0.081 / U:23.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site