Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: realtek: Add RTD1319 SoC and Realtek Pym Particles EVB | From | Andreas Färber <> | Date | Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:16:09 +0200 |
| |
Hi James,
Am 21.06.20 um 01:32 schrieb Andreas Färber: > From: James Tai <james.tai@realtek.com> > > Add Device Trees for Realtek RTD1319 SoC family, RTD1319 SoC and > Realtek Pym Particles EVB. > > Signed-off-by: James Tai <james.tai@realtek.com> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > --- > v3 -> v4: > * Updated Realtek copyright for 2 out of 3 files from v3 > * Renamed from rtd1319-pymparticle.dts to rtd1319-pymparticles.dts > * Updated compatible from pymparticle to pym-particles > * Updated PMU compatible from armv8-pmuv3 to cortex-a55-pmu (Robin) > > v2 -> v3: > * Add virtual maintenance interrupt for architecture timer > * Correct the GIC redistributor address range [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd13xx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd13xx.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..8c5b6fc7b8eb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd13xx.dtsi [...] > + gic: interrupt-controller@ff100000 { > + compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; > + reg = <0xff100000 0x10000>, > + <0xff140000 0x80000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
In my testing this appears to cause the following error:
[ 2.239858] irq: type mismatch, failed to map hwirq-25 for interrupt-controller@ff100000! ... [ 3.505649] kvm [1]: IPA Size Limit: 40bits [ 3.506051] kvm [1]: GICv3: no GICV resource entry [ 3.506058] kvm [1]: disabling GICv2 emulation [ 3.506081] kvm [1]: GIC system register CPU interface enabled [ 3.506175] kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1 [ 3.506293] kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully
If I change it to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, that error goes away:
[ 3.506030] kvm [1]: IPA Size Limit: 40bits [ 3.506430] kvm [1]: GICv3: no GICV resource entry [ 3.506437] kvm [1]: disabling GICv2 emulation [ 3.506459] kvm [1]: GIC system register CPU interface enabled [ 3.506551] kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1 [ 3.506672] kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully
In-tree RTD1619 has it as HIGH, too, but doesn't show above error:
[ 2.918973] kvm [1]: IPA Size Limit: 40bits [ 2.919345] kvm [1]: GICv3: no GICV resource entry [ 2.919352] kvm [1]: disabling GICv2 emulation [ 2.919373] kvm [1]: GIC system register CPU interface enabled [ 2.919522] kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1 [ 2.919700] kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully
RTD1619 doesn't show an error either if I change it to LOW though:
[ 2.918843] kvm [1]: IPA Size Limit: 40bits [ 2.919212] kvm [1]: GICv3: no GICV resource entry [ 2.919218] kvm [1]: disabling GICv2 emulation [ 2.919240] kvm [1]: GIC system register CPU interface enabled [ 2.919390] kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1 [ 2.919567] kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully
The GICv3 bindings example does have it as 4 == HIGH, but so does the GICv2 binding example, and yet we used LOW == 8 for in-tree RTD139x, RTD129x and RTD1195. The downstream BSP uses value 4 == HIGH for both RTD16xx and RTD13xx - is it possible this was never actually tested?
Thanks in advance for clarifying the correct interrupt polarity.
> + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > + }; [snip]
Regards, Andreas
-- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
| |