lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] memory/samsung: Maybe wrong triming parameter
Date
In function create_timings_aligned, all the max is to use
dmc->min_tck->xxx, aligned with val dmc->timings->xxx.
But the dmc->timings->tFAW use dmc->min_tck->tXP?
Maybe this point is wrong parameter useing.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
---
drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
index 81a1b1d01683..22a43d662833 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int create_timings_aligned(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc, u32 *reg_timing_row,
/* power related timings */
val = dmc->timings->tFAW / clk_period_ps;
val += dmc->timings->tFAW % clk_period_ps ? 1 : 0;
- val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tXP);
+ val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tFAW);
reg = &timing_power[0];
*reg_timing_power |= TIMING_VAL2REG(reg, val);

--
2.26.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-07 13:45    [W:0.057 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site