Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Ma, Jianpeng" <> | Subject | [RESEND]block: remove unused header | Date | Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:48:08 +0000 |
| |
Dax related code already removed from this file.
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@intel.com> --- fs/block_dev.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c index 52b6f646cdbd..4163435dc231 100644 --- a/fs/block_dev.c +++ b/fs/block_dev.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/blkpg.h> #include <linux/magic.h> -#include <linux/dax.h> #include <linux/buffer_head.h> #include <linux/swap.h> #include <linux/pagevec.h> -- 2.17.1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 7:33 PM > To: Ma, Jianpeng <jianpeng.ma@intel.com> > Cc: axboe@kernel.dk; Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: block: remove unused header > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:48:46AM +0000, Ma, Jianpeng wrote: > > >From 95218bc1d79f2bcbdd8819be26efa698868a34ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > > From: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@intel.com> > > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:15:24 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] block: remove unused header. > > > > Dax related code already removed from this file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@intel.com> > > Except for the mangled patch format this looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > Can you resend it with proper patch headers?
| |