lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] mmc: sdhci: fix base clock usage in preset value
From
Date
On 17/04/20 4:55 pm, Alan Cooper wrote:
> Acked-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:27
> AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 15/04/20 7:28 pm, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 03:25:52PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> On 2/04/20 2:54 pm, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>>>> Fixed commit added an unnecessary read of CLOCK_CONTROL. The value read
>>>>> is overwritten for programmable clock preset, but is carried over for
>>>>> divided clock preset. This can confuse sdhci_enable_clk() if the register
>>>>> has enable bits set for some reason at time time of clock calculation.
>>>>> value to be ORed with enable flags. Remove the read.
>>>>
>>>> The read is not needed, but drivers usually manage the enable bits,
>>>> especially disabling the clock before changing the frequency. What driver
>>>> is it?
>>>
>>> Hopefully no driver requires this. It's just removing a trap.
>>
>> The only driver that looks like it would benefit is sdhci-brcmstb because it
>> does not clear enable bits in sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock(). Adding Al Cooper.
>> Al, can you ack this?
>
> sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock() assumed that sdhci_calc_clk() would always
> return the divider value without the enable set, so this fixes a case
> for DDR52 where the enable was not being cleared when the divider
> value was changed.
> Acked-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
>

That is good to know. The commit message needs to be updated with that
information, otherwise:

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-20 07:32    [W:0.057 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site