Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:15:27 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized" |
| |
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:46:47PM +0800, Ethon Paul wrote: > There is a typo in comment, fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>
Good eyes!!! Queued, thank you!
I did edit the commit log as shown below. Please let me know if I messed anything up.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 496c9c0dc7b259ee93ea91789a20e09421e840c1 Author: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com> Date: Sat Apr 18 19:46:47 2020 +0800
srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized" This commit fixes a typo in a comment. Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c index 6d3ef70..8ff71e5 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp) * it, if this function was preempted for enough time for the counters * to wrap, it really doesn't matter whether or not we expedite the grace * period. The extra overhead of a needlessly expedited grace period is - * negligible when amoritized over that time period, and the extra latency + * negligible when amortized over that time period, and the extra latency * of a needlessly non-expedited grace period is similarly negligible. */ static bool srcu_might_be_idle(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
| |