lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RESEND][PATCH v2] phy: qcom-qusb2: Re add "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy" compat string
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:57 AM John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a regression in 5.7-rc1.
>
> In commit 8fe75cd4cddf ("phy: qcom-qusb2: Add generic QUSB2 V2
> PHY support"), the change was made to add "qcom,qusb2-v2-phy"
> as a generic compat string. However the change also removed
> the "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy" compat string, which is documented
> in the binding and already in use.
>
> This patch re-adds the "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy" compat string
> which allows the driver to continue to work with existing dts
> entries such as found on the db845c.
>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Cc: Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Fixes: 8fe75cd4cddf ("phy: qcom-qusb2: Add generic QUSB2 V2 PHY support")
> Reported-by: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Re-adding reviews from:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/158631458374.216820.17829557619378130779@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=Wh9_4a-cDGPdpMrXUi_HmJvS-a2Ubeyo5WG3sgwVWKKQ@mail.gmail.com

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

...as of an hour ago Bjorn also picked up:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583747589-17267-8-git-send-email-sanm@codeaurora.org

...and it's now in the Qualcomm for-next and ci-next. It's still a
bit of a pain that -rc1 will have the regression since many other
maintainers will base their next branches on that, but not much to be
done about it now.

-Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-14 21:26    [W:0.489 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site