lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 01/23] irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if offered
Hi Zenghui,

On 2020-03-12 06:30, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2020/3/5 4:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> To allow the direct injection of SGIs into a guest, the GICv4.1
>> architecture has to sacrifice the Active state so that SGIs look
>> a lot like LPIs (they are injected by the same mechanism).
>>
>> In order not to break existing software, the architecture gives
>> offers guests OSs the choice: SGIs with or without an active
>> state. It is the hypervisors duty to honor the guest's choice.
>>
>> For this, the architecture offers a discovery bit indicating whether
>> the GIC supports GICv4.1 SGIs (GICD_TYPER2.nASSGIcap), and another
>> bit indicating whether the guest wants Active-less SGIs or not
>> (controlled by GICD_CTLR.nASSGIreq).
>
> I still can't find the description of these two bits in IHI0069F.
> Are they actually architected and will be available in the future
> version of the spec? I want to confirm it again since this has a
> great impact on the KVM code, any pointers?

Damn. The bits *are* in the engineering spec version 19 (unfortunately
not a public document, but I believe you should have access to it).

If the bits have effectively been removed from the spec, I'll drop the
GICv4.1 code from the 5.7 queue until we find a way to achieve the same
level of support.

I've emailed people inside ARM to find out.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-12 10:28    [W:0.105 / U:1.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site