lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries
Date
> > > > > It doesn't apply to our for-next branch.
> > > > Sorry to hear that. I've rebased the series on mainline 5.5-rc7.
> > > > Should I
> > > rebase it on for-next branch?
> > >
> > > You should always base your branch on the for-next (whatever it's
> > > being
> > > called) of the subsystem your series against of.
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > The current series has a dependency on Tiger Lake and Elkhart Lake patche
> which is merged in to mainline.
> >
> > (554f269f0f38 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Elkhart Lake
> > support 49a437941c3f platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Tiger
> > Lake support
> > 6268c0b278b5 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Make debugfs entry for
> > pch_ip_power_gating_status conditional
> > e39854781830 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Create platform dependent
> > bitmap structs
> > b1cb33dae414 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma
> > after the termination line)
> >
> > But they are not available in for-next branch. I am confused, how that could
> be the case. For me to base the current series on for-next branch, the
> dependency patch series should be available in for-next branch.
>
> I'm wondering how did you check it?
> The branch location is in this [1] tree.

Thank you for your patience Andy. I apologize for the mishap as I was checking in the wrong tree. I have rebased the series on for-next branch on right tree this time and sent v2.

>
> [1]: http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-05 00:11    [W:0.078 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site