Messages in this thread | | | From | "Kammela, Gayatri" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:00:43 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:00 AM > To: Kammela, Gayatri <gayatri.kammela@intel.com> > Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel > Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Somayaji, Vishwanath > <vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com>; Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>; > Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerberg@intel.com>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > <peterz@infradead.org>; Prestopine, Charles D > <charles.d.prestopine@intel.com>; Pandruvada, Srinivas > <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Box, David E > <david.e.box@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs > entries > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:03 PM Kammela, Gayatri > <gayatri.kammela@intel.com> wrote: > > > > It doesn't apply to our for-next branch. > > Sorry to hear that. I've rebased the series on mainline 5.5-rc7. Should I > rebase it on for-next branch? > > You should always base your branch on the for-next (whatever it's being > called) of the subsystem your series against of.
Hi Andy,
The current series has a dependency on Tiger Lake and Elkhart Lake patche which is merged in to mainline.
(554f269f0f38 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Elkhart Lake support 49a437941c3f platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Tiger Lake support 6268c0b278b5 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Make debugfs entry for pch_ip_power_gating_status conditional e39854781830 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Create platform dependent bitmap structs b1cb33dae414 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma after the termination line)
But they are not available in for-next branch. I am confused, how that could be the case. For me to base the current series on for-next branch, the dependency patch series should be available in for-next branch.
> > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
| |