Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:32:21 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: use cpu_possible_mask instead of cpu_active_mask to break affinity |
| |
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:54:49PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > @@ -4909,8 +4909,9 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu) > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); > > + /* don't rely on the scheduler to force break affinity for us. */
I'm not sure this comment is helpful. The comment may make sense right now while the scheduler behavior is changing but down the line it's not gonna make whole lot of sense.
> for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) > - WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_active_mask) < 0); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_possible_mask) < 0); > > mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |