Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:06:23 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface |
| |
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:32:58 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:57:40AM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Are there conflicts with trees other than hmm? > > > > We can put it on a topic branch and merge to hmm to resolve. If hmm > > has problems then send the topic on its own? > > I see two new walk_page_range user in linux-next related to MADV_COLD > support (which probably really should use walk_range_vma), and then > there is the series from Steven, which hasn't been merged yet.
Would it be practical to create a brand new interface with different functions names all in new source files? Once all callers are migrated over and tested, remove the old code?
| |