Messages in this thread | | | From | Thiago Jung Bauermann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function | Date | Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:41:25 -0300 |
| |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>> -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ >> -bool sev_active(void) >> -{ >> - return is_prot_virt_guest(); >> -} >> - >> bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) >> { >> - return sev_active(); >> + return is_prot_virt_guest(); >> } > > Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted? > > Otherwise looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thank you for your review on al these patches.
-- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center
| |