lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function
> -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
> -bool sev_active(void)
> -{
> - return is_prot_virt_guest();
> -}
> -
> bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return sev_active();
> + return is_prot_virt_guest();
> }

Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-18 10:46    [W:0.213 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site