Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function |
| |
> -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ > -bool sev_active(void) > -{ > - return is_prot_virt_guest(); > -} > - > bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) > { > - return sev_active(); > + return is_prot_virt_guest(); > }
Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
| |