lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [REVIEW][PATCHv2 03/26] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:11:19AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> >> index ade32046f3fe..e45d5b440fb1 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> >> @@ -256,7 +256,10 @@ void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, void __user *addr,
> >> const char *str)
> >> {
> >> arm64_show_signal(signo, str);
> >> - force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
> >> + if (signo == SIGKILL)
> >> + force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
> >> + else
> >> + force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
> >> }
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >
> > Are you planning to send this series on, or would you like me to pick this
> > into the arm64 tree?
>
> I am planning on taking this through siginfo tree, unless it causes
> problems.

Okey doke, it would just be nice to see this patch land in 5.2, that's
all.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-24 12:01    [W:0.044 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site