lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [REVIEW][PATCHv2 03/26] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:11:19AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> >> index ade32046f3fe..e45d5b440fb1 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> >> @@ -256,7 +256,10 @@ void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, void __user *addr,
>> >> const char *str)
>> >> {
>> >> arm64_show_signal(signo, str);
>> >> - force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
>> >> + if (signo == SIGKILL)
>> >> + force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
>> >> + else
>> >> + force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
>> >> }
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> >
>> > Are you planning to send this series on, or would you like me to pick this
>> > into the arm64 tree?
>>
>> I am planning on taking this through siginfo tree, unless it causes
>> problems.
>
> Okey doke, it would just be nice to see this patch land in 5.2, that's
> all.

As this does not appear to have any real world consequences I am aiming
at 5.3. If someone else would like to take it and feed it to Linus
sooner I won't object.

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-25 00:37    [W:0.065 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site