Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules | From | Mimi Zohar <> | Date | Thu, 07 Mar 2019 17:34:35 -0500 |
| |
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 14:27 -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) { > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG)) > > + set_module_sig_enforced(); > > return sb_arch_rules; > > Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features > automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the > same in IMA?
IMA-appraisal is extending the "secure boot" concept to the running system.
Mimi
| |