lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
From
Date
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 14:27 -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> > + set_module_sig_enforced();
> > return sb_arch_rules;
>
> Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features
> automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the
> same in IMA?

IMA-appraisal is extending the "secure boot" concept to the running
system.

Mimi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-07 23:35    [W:0.080 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site