Messages in this thread | | | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Date | Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:27:30 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules |
| |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) { > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG)) > + set_module_sig_enforced(); > return sb_arch_rules;
Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the same in IMA?
| |