Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Bart Van Assche <> | Subject | [PATCH] workqueue: Fix spelling in source code comments | Date | Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:57:25 -0800 |
| |
Change "execuing" into "executing" and "guarnateed" into "guaranteed".
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index fc5d23d752a5..57ad76486a9a 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq) worker = current_wq_worker(); /* - * Return %true iff I'm a worker execuing a work item on @wq. If + * Return %true iff I'm a worker executing a work item on @wq. If * I'm @worker, it's safe to dereference it without locking. */ return worker && worker->current_pwq->wq == wq; @@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ static void rcu_work_rcufn(struct rcu_head *rcu) * * Return: %false if @rwork was already pending, %true otherwise. Note * that a full RCU grace period is guaranteed only after a %true return. - * While @rwork is guarnateed to be executed after a %false return, the + * While @rwork is guaranteed to be executed after a %false return, the * execution may happen before a full RCU grace period has passed. */ bool queue_rcu_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct rcu_work *rwork) -- 2.21.0
| |