Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:05:32 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov |
| |
On 14-11-19, 00:23, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch > series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic > dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't > happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable > reasons. > > I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I > met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we > had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP > tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to > sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do > it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to > drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this > will be good to go.
I am fixing few other issues in OPP core right now and lazy linking is next in the list :)
-- viresh
| |