Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov | From | Chanwoo Choi <> | Date | Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:39:01 +0900 |
| |
Hi Saravana,
On 11/14/19 5:23 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:48 PM Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote: >> >> Dear Saravana, >> >> Any other progress of this series? > > Hi Chanwoo, > > Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch > series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic > dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't > happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable > reasons. > > I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I > met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we > had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP > tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to > sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do > it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to > drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this > will be good to go.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I'll expect the your next version.
Thanks, Chanwoo Choi
| |