Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:54:54 +0100 | From | Halil Pasic <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] KVM: s390: use pending_irqs_no_gisa() where appropriate |
| |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:31 +0100 Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Interruption types that are not represented in GISA shall > use pending_irqs_no_gisa() to test pending interruptions. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
I guess this is just a tiny optimization.
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> --- > arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > index 005dbe7252e7..cb48736867ed 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK)) > + if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK)) > return; > if (psw_extint_disabled(vcpu)) > kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_EXT_INT); > @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static void set_intercept_indicators_mchk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK)) > + if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK)) > return; > if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu)) > vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_LPSW;
| |