Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:31:32 +0200 (CEST) | From | Nikolaus Voss <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe() |
| |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Nikolaus Voss > <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> wrote: >
[snip]
> But this discussion isn't really related to your patch. I think is > correct but just said that (b) wasn't a justification to leave the I2C > table, points (a) and (c) are though. I won't really be convinced that > the fallback is the correct thing to do or even a good idea.
I didn't want to annoy you, I just wanted to understand why you think fallback is such a bad thing that you call it a bug. And I see, it has its drawbacks ;-). Anyway, thanks for taking the time to clarify this,
Niko
[snip]
| |