Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:46:19 +0200 (CEST) | From | Nikolaus Voss <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe() |
| |
Hi Javier,
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hi Nikolaus, > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Nikolaus Voss > <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > [snip] > >>> I think Nikolaus is correct, assuming that the driver can be used on >>> legacy >>> platforms that register the I2C devices using board files / platform data. >>> In that case you still need a I2C device ID table for (a) and (c) as he >>> said. >>> >>> I don't buy on (b) though, that's a bug in my opinion. If you register an >>> I2C >>> device via DT then you must have a OF device ID entry that matches the >>> device >>> and the same for ACPI. You can't rely on the I2C device table to do the >>> match. >> >> >> Ok, in my opinion it is an elegant way of not bloating the driver when no >> explicit handling (e.g. reading DT properties) is needed. Just adding an >> of_device_id doesn't change any driver functionality then but only maps to >> an already existing i2c_table_id. >> > > I disagree, in the case of OF for example a compatible string is > composed of both a vendor a device, the complete tuple is what should > be matched. > > But with the fallback, only the device portion would be used so both > <foo,bar> and <baz,bar> will match against the i2c device with id > "bar". It may or may not be correct but the vendor portion is very > important to disambiguate.
Disambiguation via DT implies there is already a name collision in i2c modalias name space, so adding an of_id would work around this collision for DT enumeration. I2c_board_info driver binding would still be broken. The right fix would be to remove the name collision.
>>> >>> I would also remove the struct i2c_device_id .driver_data fields from the >>> I2C >>> device ID table, since are not used and just makes reading the code >>> confusing >>> (only the struct i2c_device_id .name is used as far as I can see). >> >> >> Valid point, thanks. I will change that. >> >>> >>>> Javier, just a summary of the above. Nikolaus switched one driver to >>>> use ->probe_new() hook and left i2c ID table at the same time. >>>> My understanding that this table is not anymore in use. >>>> >>>> But I have to admit I didn't see entire picture of this. Can you shed a >>>> light? >>>> >>> >>> So to shed some light, in the past even {OF,ACPI}-only drivers needed an >>> I2C ID >>> table because: 1) the .probe callback had a struct i2c_device_id * >>> parameter >>> and 2) the I2C core always reported a modalias of the form i2c:<foo> even >>> for >>> devices registered via OF. >> >> >> It could have been a null pointer and device driver binding (and >> auto-loading) done just via driver.name. >> > > I'm not sure I understood this comment.
What I was trying to say is that if the i2c_device_id table information was not needed (i.d. only one single id), even the old probe() could be used without defining an i2c_device_id table, the i2c_device_id* argument to probe() being a nullptr.
Niko
| |