lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] media: i2c: vs6624: Replace mdelay() with msleep() and usleep_range() in vs6624_probe()
Date
vs6624_probe() is never called in atomic context.
It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
mdelay() can be replaced with msleep() and usleep_range().

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c b/drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c
index 1658816a9844..bc9825f4a73d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int vs6624_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return ret;
}
/* wait 100ms before any further i2c writes are performed */
- mdelay(100);
+ msleep(100);

sensor = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
if (sensor == NULL)
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int vs6624_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
vs6624_writeregs(sd, vs6624_p1);
vs6624_write(sd, VS6624_MICRO_EN, 0x2);
vs6624_write(sd, VS6624_DIO_EN, 0x1);
- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);
vs6624_writeregs(sd, vs6624_p2);

vs6624_writeregs(sd, vs6624_default);
--
2.17.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-27 05:03    [W:0.084 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site