Messages in this thread | | | From | NeilBrown <> | Date | Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:04:37 +1000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] rhashtable: don't hold lock on first table throughout insertion. |
| |
On Wed, Jul 25 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> >> Looks good ... except ... naming is hard. >> >> is_after_call_rcu_init() asserts where in the lifecycle we are, >> is_after_call_rcu() tests where in the lifecycle we are. >> >> The names are similar but the purpose is quite different. >> Maybe s/is_after_call_rcu_init/call_rcu_init/ ?? > > How about rcu_head_init() and rcu_head_after_call_rcu()?
Yes, I like those. Thanks, NeilBrown [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |