Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:15:00 +0530 | From | Akshay Adiga <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle/powernv : Add Description for cpuidle state |
| |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:04:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Is this a new property ? I'm not fan of adding yet another of those > silly arrays. > > I would say this is the right time now to switch over to a node per > state instead, as we discussed with Vaidy.
I posted the node based device tree here : skiboot patch : https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/923120/ kernel patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/30/1146
Do you have any inputs for this design ?
> > Additionally, while doing that, we can provide the versioning mechanism > I proposed so we can deal with state specific issues and erratas. > > Cheers, > Ben. >
| |