Messages in this thread |  | | From | Linus Walleij <> | Date | Wed, 16 May 2018 16:31:10 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver |
| |
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote: >> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>: >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote: >> >>> V5: >>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7. >> >> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch >> set and not too much for you to rebase. > > thanks! > > Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending... > >> >> It's fine to just resend the rest next time. > > There is only one point open before resending: > > what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK? > > * GENMASK(4, 0) > * or 0x1f
No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver contributors are most convenient with.
Yours, Linus Walleij
|  |