Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:56:21 +0200 | From | Andrea Parri <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() |
| |
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:47:49AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can't we just kill off spin_is_locked? It seems pretty much all uses > should simply be replaced with lockdep annotations, and there aren't > many to start with.
Yeah, this is not the first time such a question has been raised ;) In fact, some people (see, e.g., Peter's comment in this thread) have also suggested extending it to {mutex,rwsem,bit_spin}_is_locked (the number of uses would then increase to a few hundreds, and lockdep would need some extensions...). Of course, removing the docbook headers should not cause particular trouble, once/if the removal of these primitives will be realized... ;)
Andrea >
|  |