Messages in this thread |  | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() | Date | Tue, 03 Apr 2018 16:23:07 +0100 |
| |
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't understand your objection: are you suggesting to add > something like "Always return 0 on !SMP" to the comment? what else?
Something like that, possibly along with a warning that this might not be what you want. You might actually want it to return true on !SMP, it depends on what you're using it for.
David
|  |