Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: switch to dma_XX barriers for rpmsg | From | Jason Wang <> | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:04:36 +0800 |
| |
On 2018年04月20日 01:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > virtio is using barriers to order memory accesses, thus > dma_wmb/rmb is a good match. > > Build-tested on x86: Before > > [mst@tuck linux]$ size drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > text data bss dec hex filename > 11392 820 0 12212 2fb4 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > > After > mst@tuck linux]$ size drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > text data bss dec hex filename > 11284 820 0 12104 2f48 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o > > Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > --- > > It's good in theory, but could one of RPMSG maintainers please review > and ack this patch? Or even better test it? > > All these barriers are useless on Intel anyway ... > > include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h > index bbf3252..fab0213 100644 > --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static inline void virtio_rmb(bool weak_barriers) > if (weak_barriers) > virt_rmb(); > else > - rmb(); > + dma_rmb(); > } > > static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers) > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void virtio_wmb(bool weak_barriers) > if (weak_barriers) > virt_wmb(); > else > - wmb(); > + dma_wmb(); > } > > static inline void virtio_store_mb(bool weak_barriers,
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
| |