lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] selftest: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support
Date
The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support.  The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
pass.

Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void)
{
int *rcv_fd, nodes;

- if (numa_available() < 0)
- error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+ if (numa_available() < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support");
+ return 0;
+ }

nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;

--
2.11.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-06 16:11    [W:1.676 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site