Messages in this thread | | | From | Derek Basehore <> | Subject | RFC [PATCH 0/1] Fix lockdep false positive | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:25:05 -0800 |
| |
I'm not sure if I'm breaking any detection with this patch since I haven't looked at that lockdep code before. I do know that the unlock order for locks with a nest lock should not matter, though. Specifically, you should be able to unlock the nest lock followed by all the locks nested underneath it.
Derek Basehore (1): locking/lockdep: Fix nest lock warning on unlock
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-- 2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
| |