Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:21:39 -0600 | From | Josh Poimboeuf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls |
| |
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:16:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > All other usecases are bonus, but it would certainly be interesting to > > investigate the impact of using these APIs for tracing: that too is a > > feature enabled everywhere but utilized only by a small fraction of Linux > > users - so literally every single cycle or instruction saved or hot-path > > shortened is a major win. > > For tracing, we'd want static_call_set_to_nop() or something like that, right?
Are we talking about tracepoints? Or ftrace?
-- Josh
| |