| From | Andy Lutomirski <> | Date | Fri, 9 Nov 2018 07:16:17 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls |
| |
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > All other usecases are bonus, but it would certainly be interesting to > investigate the impact of using these APIs for tracing: that too is a > feature enabled everywhere but utilized only by a small fraction of Linux > users - so literally every single cycle or instruction saved or hot-path > shortened is a major win.
For tracing, we'd want static_call_set_to_nop() or something like that, right?
--Andy
|