Messages in this thread | | | From | Kees Cook <> | Date | Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:58:13 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses |
| |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:08 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by > the project to correct this ambiguity. > > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@llwyncelyn.cymru> > Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting > > -- > 2.13.7 >
-- Kees Cook Pixel Security
| |