Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:07:52 +0900 | Subject | [Question] directory for SoC-related DT binding |
| |
Hi,
I see a bunch of vendor (or SoC) names in Documentation/device/bindings/arm/
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mrvl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/npcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/nxp ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ux500 ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500
I also see some vendor names in Documentation/device/bindings/soc/
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/bcm ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte
Confusingly, I see bcm, mediatek, rockchip in both locations.
Is there any rule to choose one than the other?
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |