lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use unlikely for release case
Date
Since the variable release is only nonzero when another unlikely
case occurs, use unlikely() on it seems logical.

Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 71fbba96..0f01af0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
}
spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);

- if (release)
+ if (unlikely(release))
dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, release);
f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, *count, true, true);
return 0;
--
2.7.4

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-05 09:40    [W:0.051 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site