Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Geliang Tang <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/2] perf/core: fix should it be static warnings | Date | Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:25:50 +0800 |
| |
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
kernel/events/core.c:199:6: warning: symbol 'update_perf_cpu_limits' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/events/core.c:475:6: warning: symbol 'perf_cgroup_switch' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/events/core.c:7753:12: warning: symbol 'perf_init_event' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> --- kernel/events/core.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index f87b434..f88e4ad 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static int perf_sample_period_ns __read_mostly = DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PERIOD_NS; static int perf_sample_allowed_ns __read_mostly = DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PERIOD_NS * DEFAULT_CPU_TIME_MAX_PERCENT / 100; -void update_perf_cpu_limits(void) +static void update_perf_cpu_limits(void) { u64 tmp = perf_sample_period_ns; @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ perf_cgroup_set_timestamp(struct task_struct *task, * mode SWOUT : schedule out everything * mode SWIN : schedule in based on cgroup for next */ -void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode) +static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode) { struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx; struct pmu *pmu; @@ -7750,7 +7750,7 @@ static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event) return ret; } -struct pmu *perf_init_event(struct perf_event *event) +static struct pmu *perf_init_event(struct perf_event *event) { struct pmu *pmu = NULL; int idx; -- 2.5.0
| |