Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:26:12 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] prepare zbud to be used by zram as underlying allocator | From | Vitaly Wool <> |
| |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:
> > just a side note, > I'm afraid this is not how it works. numbers go first, to justify > the patch set. >
These patches are extension/alignment patches, why would anyone need to justify that?
But just to help you understand where I am coming from, here are some numbers: zsmalloc zbud kswapd_low_wmark_hit_quickly 4513 5696 kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly 861 902 allocstall 2236 1122 pgmigrate_success 78229 31244 compact_stall 1172 634 compact_fail 194 95 compact_success 464 210
These are results from an Android device having run 3 'monkey' tests each 20 minutes, with user switch to guest and back in between.
| |