lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the tip tree
Hi Alexander,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in:

arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c

between commit:

c56dadf39761 ("sched/preempt, powerpc, kvm: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched()")

from the tip tree and commit:

ec2571650826 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Make use of unused threads when running guests")

from the kvm-ppc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index a9f753fb73a8,fad52f226c12..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@@ -2178,11 -2670,12 +2670,13 @@@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_r
vc->runner = vcpu;
if (n_ceded == vc->n_runnable) {
kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc);
- } else if (should_resched()) {
+ } else if (need_resched()) {
+ vc->vcore_state = VCORE_PREEMPT;
+ kvmppc_vcore_preempt(vc);
/* Let something else run */
cond_resched_lock(&vc->lock);
- vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;
+ if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_PREEMPT)
+ kvmppc_vcore_end_preempt(vc);
} else {
kvmppc_run_core(vc);
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-24 08:21    [W:0.077 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site